<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bug Fixing Attitude</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/2006-04-09/bug-fixing-attitude/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/2006-04-09/bug-fixing-attitude</link>
	<description>a.k.a kikidonk — Scabreusement Hype</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Frandsen</title>
		<link>http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/2006-04-09/bug-fixing-attitude#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Frandsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 09:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/2006-04-09/bug-fixing-attitude#comment-921</guid>
		<description>Happily it seems like there was some defect in the Coverity scan April 10th - now the stats are much better (the total number of code lines was wrong too):

Defects / 1000 lines of code: 0.252
Current # Defects: 810

/Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happily it seems like there was some defect in the Coverity scan April 10th - now the stats are much better (the total number of code lines was wrong too):</p>
<p>Defects / 1000 lines of code: 0.252<br />
Current # Defects: 810</p>
<p>/Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphaël Slinckx</title>
		<link>http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/2006-04-09/bug-fixing-attitude#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphaël Slinckx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 13:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/2006-04-09/bug-fixing-attitude#comment-911</guid>
		<description>No it's a CPC 6128 !
http://www.old-computers.com/museum/computer.asp?c=111&#038;st=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No it&#8217;s a CPC 6128 !<br />
<a href="http://www.old-computers.com/museum/computer.asp?c=111&#038;st=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.old-computers.com/museum/computer.asp?c=111&#038;st=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zefredz</title>
		<link>http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/2006-04-09/bug-fixing-attitude#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>zefredz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/2006-04-09/bug-fixing-attitude#comment-909</guid>
		<description>Is this computer a CPC 464 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this computer a CPC 464 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamstrup</title>
		<link>http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/2006-04-09/bug-fixing-attitude#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>kamstrup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 07:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/2006-04-09/bug-fixing-attitude#comment-907</guid>
		<description>Hehe :-) Is that you submitting your first patch to Emacs-0.1?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe <img src='http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> Is that you submitting your first patch to Emacs-0.1?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Frandsen</title>
		<link>http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/2006-04-09/bug-fixing-attitude#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Frandsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 06:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/2006-04-09/bug-fixing-attitude#comment-906</guid>
		<description>And it looks like Gnome could do with some bug fixing :-(

See http://scan.coverity.com/

Defects / 1000 lines of code: 2.824
Current # Defects: 1529

I am a happy Gnome user, and I hope somebody with the the skills (and attitude) will bring that number down :-)

Regards,

/Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it looks like Gnome could do with some bug fixing <img src='http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>See <a href="http://scan.coverity.com/" rel="nofollow">http://scan.coverity.com/</a></p>
<p>Defects / 1000 lines of code: 2.824<br />
Current # Defects: 1529</p>
<p>I am a happy Gnome user, and I hope somebody with the the skills (and attitude) will bring that number down <img src='http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>/Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ploum</title>
		<link>http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/2006-04-09/bug-fixing-attitude#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>Ploum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 19:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/2006-04-09/bug-fixing-attitude#comment-905</guid>
		<description>Cute &#38; Sail !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cute &amp; Sail !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
